PRIVACY INJUNCTIONS

Should people of power ,ie footballers actors politicions , Be allowed to have privacy injuctions when they have been named or asscoiated with affairs ,Or call girls or un lawful acts etc .
Or should they be named and shamed like the other person involved ?
Whats your views .....

they choose their life so they should know they are in the limelight
so yes they should be named and shamed just like this stud would be

http://europeansportsnews.paddypower.com/index.php?fn=Ian&ln=Laverty

told you i was good

Politicions should be shamed as they are "supposed" to be running the country.The others well not really bothered either way as sometimes it will make them more famous.
I do however think a certain man not naming him but at the moment he is bald...but is a right flirty ,maybe should be named

I don't care of what that people do in their personal life. But if nobody willn't watch for them, they can break the rules and laws more often than they do it now.
Sorry for wrong grammar(maybe)

I think that they are living there lives in the public eye , And the likes of Wayne Rooney and Ryan Giggs should realise that they have young children out there who admire them and want to be like them so should think carefully about there life choices and set a better example in life , Also If the women/men involved in these scandals are lastered all over twitter , press etc , Then the other arty should be named and shamed also , After all it takes two to tango so to speak ,......
As for the carryon of Mr Ian Laverty well it will actch up with him sooner or later and Im sure someone will and tell , Even though he thinks by going baldd people wont reconise him